If you could own only one handgun wouldnt it be this one??

Posts related to handguns (pistols, revolvers)
Post Reply
User avatar
jonahpach
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: Aizawl
Contact:

If you could own only one handgun wouldnt it be this one??

Post by jonahpach » Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:56 pm

Speak softly and carry a big gun!

For Advertising mail webmaster
User avatar
xl_target
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 3488
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:47 am
Location: USA

Re: If you could own only one handgun wouldnt it be this one??

Post by xl_target » Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:24 am

No way Jonah!
That looks like an accident waiting to happen.
“Never give in, never give in, never; never; never; never – in nothing, great or small, large or petty – never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense” — Winston Churchill, Oct 29, 1941

User avatar
jonahpach
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: Aizawl
Contact:

Re: If you could own only one handgun wouldnt it be this one??

Post by jonahpach » Wed Apr 13, 2011 6:25 pm

Well, fact is it hasnt been successful. Maybe it isnt very practical in its present 'avatar' but I still like the 'dual bore' principle. Maybe it can be 're engineered' to do away with its evident faults. I still like the kind of 'out of the box' thinking that went behind its creation..

Jonah
Speak softly and carry a big gun!

User avatar
Vikram
We post a lot
We post a lot
Posts: 5126
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 6:14 am
Location: Tbilisi,Georgia

Re: If you could own only one handgun wouldnt it be this one??

Post by Vikram » Wed Apr 13, 2011 6:33 pm

I certainly appreciate the ingenuity of the design.But, that certainly would not be the choice if I were to have only one handgun.

Best-
Vikram
It ain’t over ’til it’s over! "Rocky,Rocky,Rocky....."

User avatar
HSharief
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 568
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 6:11 pm
Location: Misriganj

Re: If you could own only one handgun wouldnt it be this one??

Post by HSharief » Wed Apr 13, 2011 7:28 pm

Definitely ingenious. IMHO, Most innovative products fail NOT because of the product itself but because of execution and/or marketing. If this was brought out by S&W or Ruger, it would be the newest rage.

But now think about it reasonably, this is what I think, others may think differently. Would I rather have 5 .22s or 3 .380s, I'm no ballistic expert but they are both equal in my view considering stopping a bad guy. You may have to shoot him twice or five times with a .22 and maybe only once or three times with the .380. That is if the bad guy is the size of Pee-Wee Herman. (I'll still want a PPK sometime in the future). So, its all a wash anyway. Now, if they "upped" it to say 5 .380s and say 3 .44s, one to carry for defense in the urban jungle and the other for bear while fishing or hiking, that "could" be a better use. I still like the Cobray, anything that goes bang is good :)

BTW, Did you see the Chiappa "Rhino" revolver, it fires the cylinder at the 6 o'clock position.

http://chiappafirearms.com/product/725

User avatar
The Doc
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1253
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:25 am
Location: India.

Re: If you could own only one handgun wouldnt it be this one??

Post by The Doc » Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:09 pm

The design is very interesting but lets see this in the Indian context Jonah , here, the licensing office people from bottom to top chair would not have even the faintest idea .......

1. whether it is a pistol or a revolver (looks more like a pistol they would argue)
2. how to endorse this two different caliber-ed revolver on a license
3. whether to count it as one firearm or two . If counted as two firearms, one would be able to keep just one more firearm (in addition to the Cobray .22/.380) legally, provided that the other firearm is not a combination firearm as well ! :mrgreen:
4. whether to endorse the other cylinder on the license or not .
5. how to divide the ammo quota between .22lr and .380 acp calibers
6. whether .380 is PB !!!!! (yes, it still is a debatable subject in those offices) :evil:

best,
Rp.
It's always better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it !

winnie_the_pooh
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1776
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:49 pm

Re: If you could own only one handgun wouldnt it be this one??

Post by winnie_the_pooh » Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:47 pm

I think H&K used to make a pistol with interchangeable barrels in .22,.25,.32 and .380.Here it is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler_%26_Koch_HK4

User avatar
xl_target
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 3488
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:47 am
Location: USA

Re: If you could own only one handgun wouldnt it be this one??

Post by xl_target » Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:49 pm

Frankly if I were down to choosing just one handgun, I would approach it this way.
I would get a SIG 226 in .40 S&W and then purchase a factory .357 SIG barrel. This will give you two magazines that can be used in both .40 and the .357 SIG
Then I would purchase an after-market 9mm barrel and two magazines.
SIG also sells a .22 slide and mag combo for the gun.
Image
image from SIG's website
This would basically cover several self defense calibers that one might need plus allow you to use .22 LR for plinking, using the same grip and trigger system (in a configuration with guaranteed performance).
Kinda like the Swiss Army knife of handguns, you can do this on several SIG models (like the P229.)
However due to PB constraints and ammo availability, this might not be such a good idea for India.

If I was in India, being subject to Indian rules, I would consider the Ruger Blackhawk in .327 Federal Magnum. This will allow the firing of .32 S&W and .32 S&W long in addition of .32 Federal Mag.
Image
image from Ruger's website

Ruger also made a Single Six in .32 H&R Mag at one time (SeeHere) which would be smaller than a Blackhawk.
Image
image fromHere


Ruger also makes a 3 inch barreled Ruger SP101 in .327 Federal Mag.
Image
image from Ruger's website

Winnie,
I'm sure you are aware that those HK convertibles are collectors items now and probably cost an arm and a leg and your first born. They also might be very hard to find. The concept was nice though.
“Never give in, never give in, never; never; never; never – in nothing, great or small, large or petty – never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense” — Winston Churchill, Oct 29, 1941

Post Reply