
The agenda seems simple:- make the process of applying for a license/renewal as painful,unpleasant and cumbersome and "time wasting" as possible, and include useless criteria that will further reduce applicants.
Under normal license issuing conditions, most applicants have to go through an interview by the SHO or an Sub-Inspector who will visit the applicant's residence, plus licenses are seldom issued without recommendation of a Politician or IAS/IPS officer, so the question of an insane person being issued a license is near impossible.
How are any of these new requirements curbing or preventing crime in anyway. Identity proof,Address proof, proof of sound mind(this actually requires psychological testing but is not fool proof,not some medical certificate), Proof of threat, Proof of Participation in Competitions, Proof of Travel to other states on a regular basis,where does the list end???

The Policy cannot be in direct or indirect contravention of either the Law or the spirit of the Law. The deliberate attempt to add burdensome requirements to licensing is not helping the crime situation!!
Some important questions that need answers:
1.How are Terrorists getting their firearms??
2.How are Criminal gangs getting their firearms??
3.How many licensed firearms are being used for illegal activities, by current licensees??
4.How many Stolen firearms,from licensees are being used in Crimes??
5.How many stolen firearms from the Police are being used in Crimes??
5. What is being done to curb any of the above??
6.How is putting more restrictions on already law abiding licensees help matters??(Is it not like reducing
the number of guns in the hands of the good guys?):shock:

7.Why is the government distrustful of those very people that elected it into office??
Regards,
Anand