Am as speechless & heart-broken as each one of you out here. I re-read the judgement several times and have been pondering over it. Was it that the case put forth by respondents was weak OR Was applicants' case presented well by senior counsel member OR Was judicial system strongly influenced by second applicant as is refered to Mrs Maneka Gandhi?
I think its a very smooth VEGAN blend of all the three.
By the time I reached 50% of the document, I actually thought that this must be some kind of a joke which was supposed to be posted in "Humour Section or General Ramblings"
I too attempted of thinking intellegently

I thus submit my conclusion stating that "Yes mi lord, we should bring air pistols / rifles etc. under licensing jurisdiction of RTO!"

Yes, though at the moment the judgement has been passed in jurisdiction of Delhi, it will soon spread across the country & the legislators will conveniently amend the Arms Act explicitly including "air weapons of any bore" including guns that fall under "toy category".


Awaiting to hear from our senior comrades on PoA,
Respect,
Rup