nagarifle wrote:tiwariarrun wrote:Can someone enlighten Nagarifle for the love of God, and clear his doubts for once, please? Thank you!
Regards,
Arrun
well is't there anyone? do i have to call on GBM
Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
- SUFFIX
- Almost at nirvana
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:01 am
- Location: USA
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
-
- Shooting true
- Posts: 704
- Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 3:16 pm
- Location: Chennai
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
Very good day for airgunners
Thanks
sankar
Thanks
sankar
- xl_target
- Old Timer
- Posts: 3488
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:47 am
- Location: USA
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
As Nagarifle points out:
The legal definition of "stay" is:
The legal definition of "stay" is:
Without seeing the paperwork, maybe it would be premature to celebrate this?The act of temporarily stopping a judicial proceeding through the order of a court.
“Never give in, never give in, never; never; never; never – in nothing, great or small, large or petty – never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense” — Winston Churchill, Oct 29, 1941
-
- One of Us (Nirvana)
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:46 am
- Location: Secunderabad
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
Well ''some news'' is GOOD news!after all these days......im celebrating...whatever.....thanks to the NRAI and Mr.Girish Sharma and everyone else here who contributed....
regards
p k jeetesh
regards
p k jeetesh
-
- Old Timer
- Posts: 2928
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
Below is the copy of the order of Supreme Court:
ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011
CC 19693-19695/2011
(From the judgement and order dated 30/07/2002 in CWP No.2491/2000,
dated 20/05/2011 in CM No.11288/2002 & CM No.11290/2002 in
WP.No..2491/2000 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
PEOPLE FOR ANIMALS & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and
office report )
WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19880-19882 of 2011
(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP
and office report )
S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20773-20775 of 2011
(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )
Date: 04/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Nanda, Sr.Adv.
Mr.Rameeza Hakeem, Adv. for
M/S Law Associates & Co.
Mr. G.E. Vahanwati, AG
Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, Adv.
Mr. Atul Nanda, Sr.Adv.
Mr. Amol Nirmalkumar Suryawanshi, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order is allowed.
Delay condoned.
Issue notice in all the SLPs.
The interim order of the High Court dated 1st November, 2002, shall continue until further orders.
[ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Veena Khera ]
Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011
CC 19693-19695/2011
(From the judgement and order dated 30/07/2002 in CWP No.2491/2000,
dated 20/05/2011 in CM No.11288/2002 & CM No.11290/2002 in
WP.No..2491/2000 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
PEOPLE FOR ANIMALS & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and
office report )
WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 19880-19882 of 2011
(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP
and office report )
S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 20773-20775 of 2011
(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )
Date: 04/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Nanda, Sr.Adv.
Mr.Rameeza Hakeem, Adv. for
M/S Law Associates & Co.
Mr. G.E. Vahanwati, AG
Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, Adv.
Mr. Atul Nanda, Sr.Adv.
Mr. Amol Nirmalkumar Suryawanshi, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order is allowed.
Delay condoned.
Issue notice in all the SLPs.
The interim order of the High Court dated 1st November, 2002, shall continue until further orders.
[ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Veena Khera ]
Court Master Court Master
"If my mother tongue is shaking the foundations of your State, it probably means that you built your State on my land" - Musa Anter, Kurdish writer, assassinated by the Turkish secret services in 1992
- ak27
- Almost at nirvana
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:12 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
Wonder how long would it take for the FINAL order to be disposed
Cheers anyways, atleast this 'stay' buys some time for AG lovers to swiftly pick up a few beauties!!
Cheers anyways, atleast this 'stay' buys some time for AG lovers to swiftly pick up a few beauties!!
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" - Ben Franklin
-
- On the way to nirvana
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:54 pm
- Location: Bhopal , M. P.
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
Friends,
Can somebody tell me what was the 2002 High Court order? I am not sure whether to start celebrating or wait for the final judgement?
One more thing; today's dicision does not mention the next date of hearing at supreme court.
Let us all pray to God for a sensible judgement.
Abbas
Can somebody tell me what was the 2002 High Court order? I am not sure whether to start celebrating or wait for the final judgement?
One more thing; today's dicision does not mention the next date of hearing at supreme court.
Let us all pray to God for a sensible judgement.
Abbas
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:49 pm
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
Though I could not find the original order here is a reference in the final order
Effectively what it means is that the order quashing the notification exempting air rifles/pistols has been stayed.Or in other words,the notification exempting air rifles/pistols stands till the Supreme Court decides the matter.The applicants herein, i.e. National Rifle Association (respondent no. 5, hereafter,
“NRA”) and Toy Air Gun, Air Rifle, Air Pistol & Pellets Manufacturers (W) Association
(respondent no. 6, hereafter “Manufacturers‟ Association”), claiming to be aggrieved by the
impugned judgment filed separate applications seeking leave to file impleadment application and
applications under Order I, Rule 10 of the C.P.C. seeking impleadment. They also filed
applications under section 151 of the Code seeking stay of the impugned judgment and separate
applications seeking clarification/modification of the impugned judgment.
The applications for stay under section 151 of the Code, being I.A. Nos. 11288/2002 (R5)
and 11288/2002 (R6) dated 08.10.2002 and 07.10.2002, respectively were allowed by order of
this Court, dated 01.11.2002. The Court also allowed the respondents‟ applications for leave to
file an application for impleadment and impleadment application and the stay of the impugned
judgment was confirmed the same day, through its order dated 23.07.2003
- darashp
- Almost at nirvana
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 11:29 am
- Location: United states of ludhiana
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
and 2012 gift for the gun lovers,we r proud to be a member of NRAI.
-
- Fresh on the boat
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 3:25 am
- Location: New Delhi
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
This is very good news. Atleast the Supreme Court saw better sense. Thank you Mr Rajiv Bhatia.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:04 pm
- Location: Mumbai
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
What are these applications , What are the details......
They also filed applications under section 151 of the Code seeking stay of the impugned judgment and separate applications seeking clarification/modification of the impugned judgment.
Rgds
M.
They also filed applications under section 151 of the Code seeking stay of the impugned judgment and separate applications seeking clarification/modification of the impugned judgment.
Rgds
M.
As an example of overcoming adversity, Karoly Takacs has few peers. He was part of Hungary’s world champion pistol-shooting team in 1938, when an army grenade exploded, crippling his right hand. Ten years later, having taught himself to shoot with his left, he won two gold medals in the rapid-fire class.
Darr ke aage jeet hai
Darr ke aage jeet hai
-
- Fresh on the boat
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 5:36 pm
- Location: Bombay
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
I am Mahesh Bhagnari.
My package is still stuck with Delhi customs and both FedEx and Jeena & Co want me to provide them with a copy of the judgement of Hon. Supreme Court before they proceed with getting my items cleared.
I have called Dushyant of FedEx as well as Azam of Jeena & Co a number of times but they are unaware of the developments, and it seems that the Custom authorities have not received any update.
Can somebody help me out?
My package is still stuck with Delhi customs and both FedEx and Jeena & Co want me to provide them with a copy of the judgement of Hon. Supreme Court before they proceed with getting my items cleared.
I have called Dushyant of FedEx as well as Azam of Jeena & Co a number of times but they are unaware of the developments, and it seems that the Custom authorities have not received any update.
Can somebody help me out?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:04 pm
- Location: Mumbai
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
What notice was issued to PFA as mentioned here in the Hindustan Times
http://www.hindustantimes.com/sports-ne ... 91289.aspx
A Bench headed by Justice P Sathasivam also issued a notice to the Maneka Gandhi-led NGO, People For Animals (PFA), on whose petition the HC order had come.
AND the Times of India here.....
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/spor ... 369140.cms
Thanks to the apex court's intervention, the marksmen can breathe easy, for the time being. The judges, Justices P Sathasivam and J Chelameswar, issued notice to PFA and posted the matter for further hearing.
M.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/sports-ne ... 91289.aspx
A Bench headed by Justice P Sathasivam also issued a notice to the Maneka Gandhi-led NGO, People For Animals (PFA), on whose petition the HC order had come.
AND the Times of India here.....
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/spor ... 369140.cms
Thanks to the apex court's intervention, the marksmen can breathe easy, for the time being. The judges, Justices P Sathasivam and J Chelameswar, issued notice to PFA and posted the matter for further hearing.
M.
As an example of overcoming adversity, Karoly Takacs has few peers. He was part of Hungary’s world champion pistol-shooting team in 1938, when an army grenade exploded, crippling his right hand. Ten years later, having taught himself to shoot with his left, he won two gold medals in the rapid-fire class.
Darr ke aage jeet hai
Darr ke aage jeet hai
-
- Fresh on the boat
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:44 am
- Location: meerut
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
hello maheshMaheshMB wrote:I am Mahesh Bhagnari.
My package is still stuck with Delhi customs and both FedEx and Jeena & Co want me to provide them with a copy of the judgement of Hon. Supreme Court before they proceed with getting my items cleared.
I have called Dushyant of FedEx as well as Azam of Jeena & Co a number of times but they are unaware of the developments, and it seems that the Custom authorities have not received any update.
Can somebody help me out?
the copy of order is available at the website of http://www.thenrai.in
i also want to import lp10 from austria . can u provide the contact details of mr dushyant ( fadex ) & azam of jeena & co.
-
- Fresh on the boat
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 3:34 pm
Re: Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court Judgement
Dear Rajiv
Can you manage to post the copy of supreme court order....
regards
gulrez
Can you manage to post the copy of supreme court order....
regards
gulrez